Climate Change

Question 1
A critical examination of the conference of climate change deniers indicates that certain
facts are outstanding. One of the things that stood out at the conference was the poster that
explains why advocacy of climate change is wrong. Notably, the poster explains that human
activities do not cause climate change and that its effects are not detrimental to the life of human
beings. Additionally, the other point that stood out is that climate change deniers have strong
relations and are powerful personalities. The third point that stood out is that the speeches of
climate change deniers exhibit numerous similarities.
Question 2
The problem of induction provides minimal scientific evidence to dismiss the existence
of climate change. One of the reasons for the assertion is that problem of induction is less
practical, and thus its use in the real world is limited. It is vital to acknowledge that observations
help us to draw conclusions from collected data and use them to develop a solution to a problem.
The other reason we cannot use the problem of induction to dismiss scientific evidence of
climate change is that observations promote rationalism, which helps prove that the claims are
consistent with reality. Notably, the problem of induction cannot be used to dismiss climate
change because it would mean that scientific evidence is insufficient to draw valid conclusions,
which is wrong.
Question 3
An examination of the video indicates that the effects of climate change are real and
governments and other concerned parties should implement suitable strategies to combat the
effects of climate change, including increasing terrestrial temperatures. The other thing that stood

3
out is that climate change has resulted in the loss of lives due to landslides, and this is significant
because it helps us understand why the government should act swiftly to curb the problem. Also,
the effects of climate change are a global concern, which helps us understand its seriousness.